Skip to content

Session Summaries

Explore Learnings and Ideas from Each Session
What Becomes Possible: Advancing Inclusive Economic and Immigrant Rights in the Bay Area and Beyond

Our opening plenary invited us into new possibilities for inclusive prosperity rooted in rights. This session offered a vision of an economy that invests in people through inclusive economic rights, exploring what becomes possible when we recognize immigrant people as essential rights-holders whose flourishing is foundational to our collective prosperity. Through dialogue with pioneering scholars and practitioners, we explored the deep interconnections between inclusive economic rights and immigrant rights. Grounded in the civil, labor, and immigrant rights movements, informed by solidarity and stratification economics, and contextualized in the current context of the Bay Area’s diverse communities, this plenary illuminated what our economy and society can look like when it is designed to promote human flourishing, innovation, and self-determination in peaceful, sustainable, and equitable ways.

But what exactly do we mean by inclusive economic rights, and why frame them as fundamental human rights? Human rights are rights we possess simply by virtue of being human. All people, regardless of what we look like or where we come from, have civil, political, social, cultural, and economic rights. These rights are indivisible and interdependent–they must exist together to reach their full potential. These rights protect our freedom to move, to build better lives for our families, and to keep our families and communities whole.

Inclusive economic rights are fundamental human rights that ensure all people–with affirmative inclusion–have access to what they need to live productive, healthy, and tranquil lives. Inclusive economic rights guarantee housing, health care, family care, debt-free college, dignified work, an income floor, an inheritance, and responsible financial services in intentionally inclusive ways. These rights recognize that when properly resourced, people are innovative and productive agents who make dynamic contributions that benefit themselves, their families, our communities, and our economy. Inclusive economic rights are the foundation for collective flourishing–promoting a more authentic form of freedom, self-determination, and solidarity.

Funding Recommendations

⇒ Invest in people. Our most treasured resource—in organizations, economy, and society—is always people

Invest in power-building.Without power, people face exploitation or charity; neither enables freedom

Fund care economy organizing. Home care and child care workers provide essential services yet remain underpaid and unprotected

Fund reparations and repair. Truth and reconciliation efforts are essential to acknowledge how we got here and inform policy going forward

Public narratives around immigrant people have been off course and disconnected from the reality of our day-to-day lives. Current narratives about the contributions of immigrant communities too often reduce their value to economic metrics—positioning them primarily as laborers and consumers—reflecting an extractive economic logic that obscures their full humanity. This narrow framing has limited our collective imagination and perpetuated harmful mental models rooted in extraction rather than mutuality, hiding the truth that immigrant people are not merely participants but active builders and shapers of our communities, culture, and country.

All economic justice and immigrant rights work is narrative change work. At the Summit, Anat Shenker-Osorio named both the opposition’s narrative architecture and the affirmative framework for replacing it. The opposition draws on racial fears and gender panic, economic resentment and status threat, and disgust with government. The Race Class Gender Narrative — which ASO Communications helped develop and test — builds cross-racial and gender solidarity, shared prosperity rooted in racial justice and gender equality, and a government that works for all of us.

In this plenary session, culture change practitioners, strategic communication strategists, and immigrant rights advocates spoke from the frontlines of narrative change — sharing what it looks like in practice to center immigrant communities as co-creators of our shared future, and what philanthropy must fund to make that vision possible at scale.

How Messages Spread: What Philanthropy Must Fund

Anat Shenker-Osorio’s research makes the case for investing beyond message development — in the narrative infrastructure, the relationships, and the conditions that allow a message to actually travel, land, and move people to act.

Activate the choir first. Before a message reaches persuadable audiences, it has to be carried by people those audiences already trust: neighbors, coworkers, faith leaders, organizers. The choir doesn’t just preach to itself — it is the delivery mechanism. Without an activated, equipped choir, the message stays inside the room it was crafted in.

Pass the baton. A message gains traction through coordinated repetition across a coalition — not through a single organization saying something once. Funders must invest in the coalition infrastructure that carries the baton, not just the message itself.

Reach people at scale. A message nobody hears cannot persuade anyone. Philanthropy routinely funds message development without funding the infrastructure to deliver it — paid media, earned media, in-language digital channels. These are not optional add-ons. They are the condition for narrative work to function.

Make bravery visible. People don’t act until they see others like them acting. Visible, relatable, joyful examples of courage convert bystanders into participants and keep them engaged. The movement that throws a better party is the movement people want to join — and stay in.

Funding Recommendations

⇒ Fund narrative infrastructure at scale. The opposition is vastly overfunded on narrative and the infrastructure to disseminate it. Values-aligned messaging and dissemination infrastructure remain woefully underfunded — and a message nobody hears cannot change minds.

⇒ Fund in-language digital engagement. Non-English platforms are not supplementary — they are primary. Reaching immigrant communities directly requires investing in the platforms, messengers, and content strategies that operate in the languages and spaces where those communities actually live.

⇒ Fund litigation as narrative. Lawsuits are not just legal strategy — they are narrative vehicles. Who your plaintiffs are and how a case is framed shapes public conversation and shifts hearts and minds.

⇒ Fund affirmative messaging. Support campaigns like Brave of Us that position immigrants not as economic inputs or objects of sympathy, but as integral builders and shapers of our communities, culture, and country.

Authentic Solidarity: The Antidote to Authoritarianism and the Politics of Division

In an era of brutal, authorized state violence against people based on who they are–the color of our skin, the language we speak, where we work–the truth is clear: We save us. We keep us safe.

The Bay Area has shown how solidarity is a powerful antidote to authoritarianism and the politics of division that pit us against each other based on our identities. Worker organizing in particular reflects people reclaiming their power and shaping democracy itself, transforming our economy from the ground up. Immigration legal representation and advocacy are also essential to this solidarity work, supporting people to defend their rights, challenging unjust systems, and advancing a fair immigration process that respects all families. This session brought critical insights from Bay Area economic justice and immigrant rights leaders on the frontlines who shared on-the-ground strategies for both immediate response and long-term progress.

Speakers explored what authentic solidarity looks like in practice, how philanthropy might be in authentic solidarity with movement leaders and immigrant communities in this moment, what authentic solidarity from local and state governments looks like, and how practicing authentic solidarity can advance inclusive economic rights—helping us not just survive the day, but thrive in the future.

Funding Recommendations

⇒ Fund immigrant rights agendas. Support comprehensive local frameworks—sanctuary protections, legal defense, worker and small business support

Fund organizing. The attacks on immigrant communities are, above all, an organizing opportunity

⇒ Invest in leadership development. Workers developed as leaders become stronger parents, neighbors, tenants, and community members

Fund trusted messengers. Workers don’t trust mainstream media; peer-to-peer outreach is critical

The Bay Area is one of the world’s wealthiest yet most inequitable regions. Our region’s wealth has been built on twin foundations: historical violence—settler colonialism, chattel slavery, exclusionary immigration, and forced relocation—and collective investment through public funding of research, education, infrastructure, and more. Yet this wealth continues to depend on exploiting a global workforce and extracting environmental resources, while systemic failures ensure prosperity remains concentrated rather than shared.

Immigrant workers have long experienced the region’s inequity through low wages, wage theft, unsafe work conditions, and exclusion from basic protections. Now they are increasingly under attack and at higher risk of being exploited. Yet across the Bay Area, immigrant people and workers are organizing themselves for inclusive prosperity and collective power—through workplace and community organizing, know your rights campaigns, public policy advocacy, and establishing their own worker cooperatives. These leaders are also on the frontlines defending themselves, their families, and their communities from racial profiling, workplace raids, and abductions.

Our region has the resources to ensure all people, regardless of what we look like or where we come from, have what we need to live productive, healthy, and tranquil lives. Realizing inclusive economic rights requires ensuring that workers have rights to organize in their workplace and build power. This session explored how immigrant communities are building power through organizing with their co-workers and ownership strategies—and how funders can support these transformative approaches.

Funding Recommendations

⇒ Commit to worker cooperatives for the long haul. Establishing cooperatives and accelerators takes years of sustained investment

⇒ Invest in worker organizing. Absent worker organizing, we go backwards; it’s essential to democratic defense

⇒ Fund stipends. Directly impacted people, interpreters, and cultural workers are essential and should be compensated

⇒ Invest in staff wellbeing. Fund living wages, staff development, and wellness supports

Strategies for Philanthropy   

What the Movement Is Asking of Funders

The leaders who gathered at the Inclusive Economic and Immigrant Rights Summit didn’t mince words about what philanthropy must do—and become—to meet the challenges we face. Throughout the Summit, speakers offered direct guidance to funders—not just on what to fund, but on how philanthropy itself must transform. The recommendations below reflect the collective wisdom of movement leaders, scholars, and practitioners.

Fund the fight. Fund the organizers. Fund the movement. Funders, we have to be bold.

Julián Castro, Latino Community Foundation

Resources

Findings and Frameworks that Ground our Summit

The Summit drew on the work of leading scholars and movement intellectuals who are redefining how we understand immigration, economic justice, and the role of philanthropy. Their research doesn’t just inform—it challenges us to see differently and act accordingly. Explore their findings frameworks below.

DEMOGRAPHY MATTERS

Who We’re Talking About When We Talk About Immigrant Rights

Dr. Manuel Pastor of USC Equity Research Institute presented research grounding us in the demographic realities of Bay Area immigrant communities—who we are, how long we’ve been here, and why this matters for philanthropy. The data challenges assumptions and underscores the stakes: when we talk about immigrant rights, we are talking about our neighbors, our workforce, and our families.

Key Takeaways:

  • California Is the U.S., Fast Forward — The national demographic shift is one California already navigated; the Bay Area’s immigrant share keeps rising
  • 2.66 Million Immigrants Call the Bay Area Home — More than a third of Bay Area residents, most here for decades, deeply rooted in our families and communities
  • Not a Monolith — Latino, Asian, and Black communities have distinct immigrant experiences; Black immigrant communities have tripled since 1990 yet remain invisible in discourse
  • Undocumented Californians Are Our Families — Over a million Bay Area residents’ daily lives are shaped by immigration policy—548,000 undocumented Californians and the 550,000 U.S. citizens and legal residents who share their households
  • We Are Baking Inequality into the Future — White households raising young children have more than twice the income of Black and Latino households in the same life stage

+ Explore

Neighbors and Numbers: Immigrant Demographics & Economic Challenges in the Bay Area — Dr. Manuel Pastor, USC Equity Research Institute  |  Visual presentation by Bay Area Asset Funders Network

POWER, PARADIGM & POLITICAL ECONOMY

The Framework Behind the Call to Fund Paradigm Change

Dr. Darrick Hamilton of The New School’s Institute on Race, Power, and Political Economy presented a framework that reorients how we think about our economy and our institutions’ role within it. For our economy to promote human flourishing, innovation, and self-determination, we must invest in and center people and the environments in which we live—not simply in a charitable sense, but in a productive, dynamic, and empowering sense. When people are properly resourced, they become the innovative, productive agents who build thriving societies.

Key Takeaways:

  • Power — The ability to fulfill purpose and have the agency to be self-determining
  • Paradigm — The collective common sense about how society works; within the current paradigm, rights-based approaches will always swim upstream because they challenge the operating system
  • Political Economy — Race, economics, and politics have never been separable; if we’re not looking at all three in an intertwined way, our approach will be limited
  • People — Our most treasured resource; invest in people and the environments in which we live so we can be self-determining and innovative
  • Philanthropy — Fund not just programs, but the paradigm shift itself—the movements, narratives, and power-building that shift the common sense of how our economy works

+ Explore

Framework developed by The New School’s Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy

Dr. Darrick Hamilton offered a Power, Paradigm, and Political Economy framework that reorients how we think about our economy and our institutions’ role within it.

Drawing on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s understanding that “power is the ability to fulfill purpose,” Dr. Hamilton articulated a North Star: Our economy should promote human flourishing, innovation, and self-determination in peaceful, sustainable, and tranquil environments.

Our current political economy is not serving that purpose. Our government, corporations, and sometimes even philanthropy manage people rather than invest in them—treating poverty, inequality, and lack of agency as the result of personal failure, defective attitudes, or individual behavior. But the source of poverty is resource deprivation, not personal deficiency.

The structures of a just and well-functioning economy invest in and center people and the environments in which we live—not simply in a charitable sense, but in a productive, dynamic, and empowering sense. This requires a fundamental reframe: viewing wealth, jobs, and services such as healthcare not as outcomes to be earned, but as strategic inputs—investing directly in people provides us with the financial agency and freedom to be self-determining. When people are properly resourced, they become innovative, productive agents who build thriving societies.

Inclusive economic rights are the tools to ensure that all people have adequate quantity, quality, and access to the goods, services, and resources essential for agency in their lives—not as charity, but as the foundation for freedom itself.

Dr. Hamilton asked: Why are common-sense policies always swimming upstream? Because of paradigm—our collective common sense about how society works. Across all systems and institutions, we continue to treat people as if their deficits need to be managed rather than their capacities invested in.

What This Means for Philanthropy:

Funders are being asked not merely to fund different programs, but to fund the paradigm shift itself—to invest in the movements, narratives, and power-building that shift the common sense of how our economy and society works.

Commit to justice. Fund paradigm change. Fund a movement so that we’re not constantly swimming upstream for common sense policies to enable people to truly be free.

Dr. Darrick Hamilton

TodayTomorrow
Government manages people through social isolation, segregation, incarceration, subsistence rather than mobilityGovernment invests in its most treasured and productive resource—the people and the environments in which we live
Treats people as labor inputs, not rights-holdersCenters people as innovative, productive agents and treats inclusive economic rights as fundamental human rights
Invests in firms as the primary engine of economic growth; manages poverty rather than building prosperityInvests in human capacity in a productive, dynamic, and empowering sense
Relies on charity to patch harms the system createsCreates equity and promotes human flourishing upstream by proactively designing human- and environment-centered systems and policies
Uses race, nativity, and other identities as weapons to divide and concentrate powerEmbraces difference and builds solidarity toward economic inclusion, social equity, and civic engagement for all

MESSAGING RESOURCES

Three Messaging Traps to Avoid

At the Summit, Anat Shenker-Osorio named three framings that progressive communicators commonly reach for, and explained why each one backfires.

Valets: “Hard-working immigrants are a vital part of a vibrant economy.” This instrumentalizes people — describing them as means to an end, not as ends in themselves. There is no path from instrumentalizing human beings to affording them human rights.

Victims: “Refugees who have endured horrors should be welcomed.” Leading with harms activates sympathy, but not solidarity. We cannot win by making people feel sad and sorry. Immigrant people must be presented as multi-dimensional, awesome beings — not objects of pity.

Villains: “There is no evidence immigrants cause crime.” Rebutting opposition claims repeats the frame you’re trying to defeat. Don’t argue inside their story — tell a different one.

Three Words To Avoid

At the Summit and in her public work, Anat Shenker-Osorio has been clear: language is not neutral. The words we choose either challenge the regime’s framing or reinforce it. Progressive communicators must attend to their own language and stop doing the opposition’s work for them.

Arrest suggests there may have been wrongdoing on the part of the person seized. Additionally, these actions have happened without legal process and therefore are not accurately characterized as arrests. Instead, say abduct or disappear.

Detention Centers or names like “Alligator Alcatraz” amplify the opposition language and eclipse the humanity of the people being held captive. Instead, say concentration camps.

Immigration Enforcement suggests a lawful, legitimate government function. Even when we use “immigration enforcement” as a critique, we are doing the opposition’s work. Instead, say crimes against humanity, attacks by ICE, or tearing families apart.

Advisory Council

This summit would not have been possible without our Advisory Council–a collaborative body of frontline leaders working at the intersection of immigrant rights and economic justice. The council’s expertise and lived experience ensured that our programming was relevant, responsive, and grounded in the Bay Area. We are deeply grateful for their leadership and invite funders to learn more about their organizations and the critical work they lead.
Alejo
Executive Director
Trabajadores Unidos Workers United
Alex Tom
Executive Director
Center for Empowered Politics
Ana Avendano
Dr. Ana Angel Avendaño
Executive Director
El Concilio California
Aura Aguilar
Lead Organizer
North Bay Jobs with Justice
Beatrice Camacho
Beatrice Camacho
Director
Undocufund
Chandra Alexandre
Chief Executive Director
Community Action Marin
Elaine Villasper
Executive Director
Filipino Community Center
Geraldine Alcid
Executive Director
Filipino Advocates for Justice
Marivel Mendoza Matheu
Executive Director
Hijas Del Campo
Raylene Hernandez
Director of Resource Development & Strategy
SOMOS Mayfair
Maria Moreno
Maria Moreno
Campaign Coordinator
Jobs with Justice SF
Sasha W.
Sasha Wright
Communications & Operations Director
Jobs with Justice SF
Yoel
Yoel Haile
Co-Director
Priority Africa Network

Photo Gallery

If you are interested in learning more about AFN’s work in this area, please contact Rebeca Rangel.

Thank you to our sponsors: